pippellia on Nostr: > But when I say PageRank is about popularity, I'm not referring to the input. I'm ...
> But when I say PageRank is about popularity, I'm not referring to the input. I'm referring to the score itself. It's designed to be a measure of popularity. The more followers you attract, the higher your PageRank score gets.
I disagree. If you swap follows for zaps, then it's about who gets the most sats, which are more closely related to subjective value (if we gloss over the complications of having weighted relationships and self zaps...)
> The GrapeRank "real nostr user" score is not a popularity contest because your score does not continue to grow unbounded.
I don't get this point at all. The same argument applies for pagerank, where all scores are bounded (at least by 1.0).
I disagree. If you swap follows for zaps, then it's about who gets the most sats, which are more closely related to subjective value (if we gloss over the complications of having weighted relationships and self zaps...)
> The GrapeRank "real nostr user" score is not a popularity contest because your score does not continue to grow unbounded.
I don't get this point at all. The same argument applies for pagerank, where all scores are bounded (at least by 1.0).