about_them_facts on Nostr: I thought that with, for example, Zeus, the model is: 1. You create a lightning ...
I thought that with, for example, Zeus, the model is:
1. You create a lightning channel between your phone's node and your LSP (zeus)
2. Because zeus is online 24/7 (and provides other services like an ln address w/ zeuspay) that this makes them a good place to open a channel with.
3. My inbound liquidity remains limited to whatever that channel has in it. When I first open the channel, it is 100% outbound liquidity.
If I move $50 into my zeus wallet from on-chain to lightning, it opens such a channel, then I have $50 in outbound liquidity, right? And no inbound liquidity? But couldn't I theoretically do that with any available routing node out there even if they're not an LSP? Aside from maybe missing out on some uptime and zeuspay, if there any difference?
1. You create a lightning channel between your phone's node and your LSP (zeus)
2. Because zeus is online 24/7 (and provides other services like an ln address w/ zeuspay) that this makes them a good place to open a channel with.
3. My inbound liquidity remains limited to whatever that channel has in it. When I first open the channel, it is 100% outbound liquidity.
If I move $50 into my zeus wallet from on-chain to lightning, it opens such a channel, then I have $50 in outbound liquidity, right? And no inbound liquidity? But couldn't I theoretically do that with any available routing node out there even if they're not an LSP? Aside from maybe missing out on some uptime and zeuspay, if there any difference?