Adrian Cochrane on Nostr: If you're going to define a "programming language" by its Turing Completeness... ...

If you're going to define a "programming language" by its Turing Completeness...

Please do so in order to expand what a programming language can be, not to constrain it! And please don't attach prestige/gatekeeping to the term!

We seem to have fixated onto textual procedural languages for the past... Is it half-a-century now?