Jonathan Underwood [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2018-11-16 📝 Original message:Nope. This is how Electrum ...

📅 Original date posted:2018-11-16
📝 Original message:Nope.

This is how Electrum treats BIP39 restoring as well, try it out.

-Jon

2018年11月16日(金) 23:04、Neill Miller さん（neillm at thecodefactory.org）のメッセージ:

> On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 02:17:30PM +0900, Jonathan Underwood via
> bitcoin-dev wrote:
> > If more apps would implement to the word of the BIP39 spec, multiple
> > languages make sense, but since reality is no one follows the spec (/the
> > spec is way too open to interpretation) then expecting every app to load
> > every language is unreasonable.
> >
> > Electrum actually handles BIP39 recovery the way the BIP specifies. I can
> > restore random strings if I want, and it warns me, and I can ignore it
> if I
> > wish.
>
> Electrum mnemonics are not based on BIP39, which is why it can do
> this.
>
> -Neill.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20181116/545faa2c/attachment.html>;