sebastien requiem [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2014-06-25 📝 Original message:On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at ...

📅 Original date posted:2014-06-25
📝 Original message:On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Lawrence Nahum <lawrence at greenaddress.it>
wrote:

> [snip]
>
> Allow me to recap BIP changes in discussion:
>
> - making some changes to allow merchants to offer discounts in case of
> instant ?
> - allowing multiple signatures ?
>
> Did I miss anything? Thoughts on the above from others?
>

Jumping on this thread after reading it all. I am in favor of the
discount offered by the merchant.

Ideally the merchant could get the amount of the wallet *fee*
for instant payment (privacy leak?). That way, the merchant
could decide to support the instant payment at 100% (better
user experience after all) or at 50% only or at 0%.

This would encourage instant payment for merchants and buyers without
(re-)creating a non-transparent system.

regards,


--
sebastien requiem - bendingspoons.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140625/2e107dbe/attachment.html>;