Peter Todd [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: š Original date posted:2015-05-12 š Original message:On Tue, May 12, 2015 at ...
š
Original date posted:2015-05-12
š Original message:On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 09:05:44AM -0700, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> A general assumption is that you will have a few archive nodes with the
> full blockchain, and a majority of nodes are pruned, able to serve only the
> tail of the chains.
Hmm?
Lots of people are tossing around ideas for partial archival nodes that
would store a subset of blocks, such that collectively the whole
blockchain would be available even if no one node had the entire chain.
--
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
0000000000000000156d2069eeebb3309455f526cfe50efbf8a85ec630df7f7c
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 650 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150512/ae0f4b3b/attachment.sig>;
š Original message:On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 09:05:44AM -0700, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> A general assumption is that you will have a few archive nodes with the
> full blockchain, and a majority of nodes are pruned, able to serve only the
> tail of the chains.
Hmm?
Lots of people are tossing around ideas for partial archival nodes that
would store a subset of blocks, such that collectively the whole
blockchain would be available even if no one node had the entire chain.
--
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
0000000000000000156d2069eeebb3309455f526cfe50efbf8a85ec630df7f7c
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 650 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150512/ae0f4b3b/attachment.sig>;