Amir Taaki [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2012-06-16 📝 Original message:Did anyone try sending ...

📅 Original date posted:2012-06-16
📝 Original message:Did anyone try sending them an email asking them to stop or offering help to fix their site? What did they say? I'm sure they would try to be accomodating.



----- Original Message -----
From: Jonathan Warren <jonathan at bitcoinstats.org>
To: bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2012 4:35 AM
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] SatoshiDice and Near-term scalability

Yes, I measure mainnet confirmation times on a regular basis.


Before fairly recently, fee-paying transactions never took anywhere close to
this long to be confirmed.

Jonathan Warren
(Bitcointalk: Atheros)

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Garzik [mailto:jgarzik at exmulti.com]
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 1:17 PM
To: bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Bitcoin-development] SatoshiDice and Near-term scalability

Hard-fork requires a very high level of community buy-in, because it shuts
out older clients who will simply refuse to consider >1MB blocks valid.

Anything approaching that level of change would need some good, hard data
indicating that SatoshiDice was shutting out the majority of other traffic.
Does anyone measure mainnet "normal tx" confirmation times on a regular
basis?  Any other hard data?



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development