Tom Honzik on Nostr: I think people are differentiating how the seller markets what they are selling. "I'm ...
I think people are differentiating how the seller markets what they are selling. "I'm selling an epic sat," vs "I'm auctioning a UTXO produced from the coinbase transaction of block 840,000 and you can interpret that however you want," the later should be much less controversial.
By extension, "I'm selling a UTXO that, viewed through the lens of ordinal theory, contains an 'epic' sat" or "I'm selling a bundle of sats, one of which you might consider epic" seems fine. It's factual and upfront that a certain viewpoint is required.
"I'm selling an epic sat according to ordinal theory" or "I'm selling an epic sat" seems like shorthand for the above... not nuanced, but also not necessarily malicious. I'm not sure where people are drawing the line.
I think the responsibility falls more on the buyer's side.
By extension, "I'm selling a UTXO that, viewed through the lens of ordinal theory, contains an 'epic' sat" or "I'm selling a bundle of sats, one of which you might consider epic" seems fine. It's factual and upfront that a certain viewpoint is required.
"I'm selling an epic sat according to ordinal theory" or "I'm selling an epic sat" seems like shorthand for the above... not nuanced, but also not necessarily malicious. I'm not sure where people are drawing the line.
I think the responsibility falls more on the buyer's side.