AvdullahYousef on Nostr: Every time the slavery question comes up re: Islam treatment of slaves, slaving, ...
Every time the slavery question comes up re: Islam treatment of slaves, slaving, etc., we get the same retarded conversations happening over and over for no good reason, just emotional secular sensibilities. Most of these objections stem in particular from the modern view of women, the philosophy of which also informs their broken and failed marriages and relationships with their womenfolk. The same people who consistently complain about the complete breakdown of the institution of marriage and family due to the Secular World Order that’s failed to grant them happiness in any way think they can apply these same principles to judge Islam and Muslims for a set of laws and framework which, funnily enough, aren’t even practiced anymore. It’s absurd.
Here’s an example: one X user pointed out the (true) legal judgement that even married women who become prisoners of war under classical Islam could be enslaved and are available to their owners. The fiqh even specifies (with differences of opinion over details) that after a menstrual cycle her marriage contract with her husband is null so long she remains a slave after that time.
This is talked about by said user and their commenters as horrible, obscene, disgraceful, etc., presumably because her being married already adds a level of tragedy and humiliation to the situation. Better yet, they grandstand and pretend that this is a violation of the sanctity of the enslaved woman’s marriage.
How rich. The people who pummeled the institution of marriage into the ground, turning it into a mockery and a cuckold humiliation for any secular couple that engages in it wants to lecture you that this situation is disgraceful and lacking respect for marriage; but alimony rape, obscene modern family court rulings, the complete lack of legal recourse or framework for the rights of the husband and wife during the marriage — all of this is okay! It’s a free society MAN!
What a joke. Let these people seethe.
Here’s an example: one X user pointed out the (true) legal judgement that even married women who become prisoners of war under classical Islam could be enslaved and are available to their owners. The fiqh even specifies (with differences of opinion over details) that after a menstrual cycle her marriage contract with her husband is null so long she remains a slave after that time.
This is talked about by said user and their commenters as horrible, obscene, disgraceful, etc., presumably because her being married already adds a level of tragedy and humiliation to the situation. Better yet, they grandstand and pretend that this is a violation of the sanctity of the enslaved woman’s marriage.
How rich. The people who pummeled the institution of marriage into the ground, turning it into a mockery and a cuckold humiliation for any secular couple that engages in it wants to lecture you that this situation is disgraceful and lacking respect for marriage; but alimony rape, obscene modern family court rulings, the complete lack of legal recourse or framework for the rights of the husband and wife during the marriage — all of this is okay! It’s a free society MAN!
What a joke. Let these people seethe.