colemccormick1 on Nostr: I’m still new to Nostr, but am totally aligned with the philosophy and bitcoin. Any ...
I’m still new to Nostr, but am totally aligned with the philosophy and bitcoin. Any other thing is sub-par if there’s no payment system. The hurdle to get through is time.
quoting note1rxe…dt6eI asked ChatGPT to “Explain how BlueSky and Nostr are different” and it actually gave a pretty solid answer. Thoughts?
—
BlueSky and Nostr are both decentralized social networking protocols, but they differ in architecture, philosophy, and functionality. Here’s a breakdown:
1. Underlying Technology
• BlueSky (AT Protocol):
• Built on the AT Protocol (Authenticated Transfer Protocol), which emphasizes interoperability, data portability, and algorithmic choice.
• BlueSky creates a federated network, similar to Mastodon, where multiple servers can host user data. Users can move between servers without losing their identities or followers.
• Nostr (Notes and Other Stuff Transmitted by Relays):
• A lightweight protocol designed to enable censorship-resistant communication.
• Relays store and transmit messages, but users are not tied to any specific relay. Anyone can run a relay, making the network extremely decentralized and resilient.
2. Governance and Development
• BlueSky:
• Initially funded and incubated by Twitter, with a centralized team driving development.
• Focused on building a polished user experience and catering to broader social media use cases.
• Nostr:
• Open-source and community-driven, with no central organization.
• Development is grassroots, driven by enthusiasts and developers focused on principles like censorship resistance and simplicity.
3. Identity and Authentication
• BlueSky:
• Uses domain names as user handles (e.g., @username.com), allowing for self-hosted identity.
• Relies on federation for user authentication and identity management.
• Nostr:
• Uses public/private key cryptography for identity. Your public key is your ID, and your private key signs messages.
• This approach eliminates reliance on third-party servers for identity.
4. Censorship Resistance
• BlueSky:
• Moderation depends on the policies of individual servers, meaning content can still be censored by server admins.
• Focuses on user control over algorithms but doesn’t prioritize censorship resistance to the extent Nostr does.
• Nostr:
• Designed to be censorship-resistant from the ground up. Messages are signed by the user’s private key and broadcast to multiple relays, making it hard to remove or block content.
5. Ecosystem and Adoption
• BlueSky:
• Aims for mainstream social media adoption, competing with platforms like Mastodon or even Twitter.
• Focuses on building user-friendly apps and features to attract a broader audience.
• Nostr:
• Has a smaller, niche community, primarily consisting of tech-savvy users and Bitcoin enthusiasts.
• Prioritizes decentralized communication tools, with additional use cases like Bitcoin payments and alternative apps (e.g., Nostr clients for chat, blogging, and even marketplaces).
6. Philosophy
• BlueSky:
• Strives for a balance between decentralization and usability, appealing to users who want control over their data without compromising on user experience.
• Nostr:
• Emphasizes maximum decentralization and freedom, even if it sacrifices usability for the average user.
Summary
• BlueSky is a federated social network protocol focusing on interoperability, user experience, and algorithmic choice, with some reliance on centralized servers for moderation.
• Nostr is a simpler, more radical protocol focused on censorship resistance and decentralization, built for users who prioritize control and freedom over polish.