TheGuySwann on Nostr: I guess we have to agree to disagree because this still has nothing to do with ...
I guess we have to agree to disagree because this still has nothing to do with storing energy.
Back to my test, if that was a battery and not money, I’d still have all the electricity I need… because it ACTUALLY stores energy. Money stores *value* in the network that trust it for exchange. Which means you can *trade it* for energy that is available, but that, explicitly, is NOT storing energy.
Sure, it sounds great when Saylor says it and it’s an interesting and useful mental image, but it does not store energy and this is very easily and objectively provable.
Go ahead and take a bitcoin balance, and without anybody else or any trade or anything, get energy out of it… you can’t, because it doesn’t *store* energy. It simply allows you to trade for it.
Back to my test, if that was a battery and not money, I’d still have all the electricity I need… because it ACTUALLY stores energy. Money stores *value* in the network that trust it for exchange. Which means you can *trade it* for energy that is available, but that, explicitly, is NOT storing energy.
Sure, it sounds great when Saylor says it and it’s an interesting and useful mental image, but it does not store energy and this is very easily and objectively provable.
Go ahead and take a bitcoin balance, and without anybody else or any trade or anything, get energy out of it… you can’t, because it doesn’t *store* energy. It simply allows you to trade for it.