buttercat1791 on Nostr: Now, if we consider same-sex attraction in itself to be a sign of sufficient ...
Now, if we consider same-sex attraction in itself to be a sign of sufficient psychological damage that it would preclude one from the fulfillment of priestly duties, then this is likely a mistake. However, I'm not convinced that simply having same-sex desires is a sign of such irrevocably deep disturbance.
Published at
2025-01-14 23:12:42Event JSON
{
"id": "1060f0a046b60abec5f5335ca3a44e6b0ca33f4115d887842a72dbf7763f3c71",
"pubkey": "70122128273bdc07af9be7725fa5c4bc0fc146866bec38d44360dc4bc6cc18b9",
"created_at": 1736896362,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"98ea09a1b6e1ebf7fa55f8d6dfe348f5ea8ed29bcc5e93ed961e051ff2324273",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"15c06a737e94b9c32a1f70f540051456bbd5eef763bb320370302e64f480e023",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"c60cf84c76063647173208c2de960c1219e04cda3db32bdbe933889c3169bdb8"
],
[
"p",
"dace63b00c42e6e017d00dd190a9328386002ff597b841eb5ef91de4f1ce8491"
],
[
"p",
"70122128273bdc07af9be7725fa5c4bc0fc146866bec38d44360dc4bc6cc18b9"
]
],
"content": "Now, if we consider same-sex attraction in itself to be a sign of sufficient psychological damage that it would preclude one from the fulfillment of priestly duties, then this is likely a mistake. However, I'm not convinced that simply having same-sex desires is a sign of such irrevocably deep disturbance.",
"sig": "0c95e9d7bf8d3b0da20a9e6128483bc776401edd72e6125ae45c920d5c80cd7c1a821d001cef18796396da7c97ebb0202bb087a615911339521aac7dc8c39070"
}
