sovereignbull on Nostr: I missed a bit off the quote: "What this means for the safety risks, particularly the ...
I missed a bit off the quote:
"What this means for the safety risks, particularly the possible integration of this DNA into the human genome"
That said, the way that regulators and the manufacturers have conducted themselves, such as data obfuscation, lying about these things existing, then lying about them being active, is suggestive to me that these are not contaminations, but they were put there intentionally, and the assays were designed in a way that would hide this information. I am open to having my biased skewed away from 'conspiracy', however, things have been trending in that direction.
This study found twice the amount of mRNA which was approved, and over 500 times the DNA limit.
So, DNA integration is a valid concern with these shots in my opinion.
"What this means for the safety risks, particularly the possible integration of this DNA into the human genome"
That said, the way that regulators and the manufacturers have conducted themselves, such as data obfuscation, lying about these things existing, then lying about them being active, is suggestive to me that these are not contaminations, but they were put there intentionally, and the assays were designed in a way that would hide this information. I am open to having my biased skewed away from 'conspiracy', however, things have been trending in that direction.
This study found twice the amount of mRNA which was approved, and over 500 times the DNA limit.
So, DNA integration is a valid concern with these shots in my opinion.