ZmnSCPxj [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2019-01-04 📝 Original message: Good morning, > - in set ...
📅 Original date posted:2019-01-04
📝 Original message:
Good morning,
> - in set reconciliation schemes: we could reconcile [channel id |
> timestamp | checksum] first
Perhaps I misunderstand how set reconciliation works, but --- if timestamp is changed while checksum is not, then it would still be seen as a set difference and still require further communication rounds to discover that the channel parameters have not actually changed.
Perhaps it is better to reconcile [channel_id | checksum] instead, and if there is a different set of channel parameters, share the set difference and sort out which timestamp is later at that point.
Regards,
ZmnSCPxj
📝 Original message:
Good morning,
> - in set reconciliation schemes: we could reconcile [channel id |
> timestamp | checksum] first
Perhaps I misunderstand how set reconciliation works, but --- if timestamp is changed while checksum is not, then it would still be seen as a set difference and still require further communication rounds to discover that the channel parameters have not actually changed.
Perhaps it is better to reconcile [channel_id | checksum] instead, and if there is a different set of channel parameters, share the set difference and sort out which timestamp is later at that point.
Regards,
ZmnSCPxj