Ghost Prototype on Nostr: Your argument is that someone is unambiguously female unless you check for the ...

Your argument is that someone is unambiguously female unless you check for the presence of female sex organs?

And you think this is a good argument?

You're doing exactly what the Genderists do and you're saying sex should be defined by physical appearance and secondary sexual characteristics, and not how sex is actually defined (reproductive capacity and genes)

And it still doesn't explain why they should be competing in a female sport, the point of which is to determine female athletic excellence. Perception does not trump material reality.