Koz Ross on Nostr: 2997 is a tricky one, because it's basically not possible to solve in software ...
2997 is a tricky one, because it's basically not possible to solve in software (contrary to Prusa's bizarre claims). The only way to fix that issue is to either reposition the extruder to the back, or to convert to a direct drive.
Prusa can't do the first of these (too drastic a change, significant footprint difference), so logically, you might assume the second. This brings us to why I mention point 1. (cont.)
Published at
2023-12-29 20:01:41Event JSON
{
"id": "1fc6b6e79bbf46d3bc5a16cc6cbb24a96a5b4be9495531b3886c8bea9fffe697",
"pubkey": "ea01c28d25fdebef270fb11977d88794eaa6e04210af4e9f0d45d2ca4df3e28e",
"created_at": 1703880101,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"31840f0f704285cabc97b4467f82dc691e27e13b5f798a67724102608396703a",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://chaos.social/users/koz/statuses/111665486351762762",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "2997 is a tricky one, because it's basically not possible to solve in software (contrary to Prusa's bizarre claims). The only way to fix that issue is to either reposition the extruder to the back, or to convert to a direct drive.\n\nPrusa can't do the first of these (too drastic a change, significant footprint difference), so logically, you might assume the second. This brings us to why I mention point 1. (cont.)",
"sig": "97d52414e449c2523fde66eca633dfbc18093bbd265d71c7cc9e0812b165de255637ab1dfbbff326a0e6aaf289f3fe3d1f208ee9ceb63600d9fa723c249c42b6"
}
