mleku on Nostr: yeah, i'm inclined to agree from my experience, they are probably pretty much ...
yeah, i'm inclined to agree from my experience, they are probably pretty much Scientology-adjacent, in fact
but the point is more about the fact that several of their "revelations" assert the material nature of the angelic host... and they have some interesting points about synthetic fibres and such also, which are all pretty much being shown to be toxic waste we should not be wearing
but yes, pretty much a cult, i guess my point is more towards a more clear question of "which Christian churches are most friendly to the understanding of the angels being physical beings
i have not intensively studied doctrine much outside of catholic and seventh day adventist (i was raised in the latter, and it also gets labeled cult as well, for much the same reasons as mormon, and JW and they also appear around the same time, at the end of the gold rush)
but the point is more about the fact that several of their "revelations" assert the material nature of the angelic host... and they have some interesting points about synthetic fibres and such also, which are all pretty much being shown to be toxic waste we should not be wearing
but yes, pretty much a cult, i guess my point is more towards a more clear question of "which Christian churches are most friendly to the understanding of the angels being physical beings
i have not intensively studied doctrine much outside of catholic and seventh day adventist (i was raised in the latter, and it also gets labeled cult as well, for much the same reasons as mormon, and JW and they also appear around the same time, at the end of the gold rush)