steepdawn on Nostr: Thank you for the response. Re Citrea. While they might be further along, it's still ...
Thank you for the response.
Re Citrea. While they might be further along, it's still far from the usual rigid requirement, and certainly not an operational product.
This just makes the whole reference to and argument for Citrea in the OP mailing list incredibly weak (and dangerous imho)
Re: GitHub
First, I disagree that this qualifies already as "harassment". It's a valid, albeit dissenting argument, which should be able to be presented at the main stage.
Second, resorting to fine print bureaucract arguments for blocking ("Oh you should not have discussed this here's but in the line over there") makes Core look incredibly weak and insecure. Especially without warning/notice.
You must see that.
This is not the way trustworthy stewardship of a critical FOSS project looks like.
Even benevolent dictators must be benevolent to not lose support from Us the People.
Re Citrea. While they might be further along, it's still far from the usual rigid requirement, and certainly not an operational product.
This just makes the whole reference to and argument for Citrea in the OP mailing list incredibly weak (and dangerous imho)
Re: GitHub
First, I disagree that this qualifies already as "harassment". It's a valid, albeit dissenting argument, which should be able to be presented at the main stage.
Second, resorting to fine print bureaucract arguments for blocking ("Oh you should not have discussed this here's but in the line over there") makes Core look incredibly weak and insecure. Especially without warning/notice.
You must see that.
This is not the way trustworthy stewardship of a critical FOSS project looks like.
Even benevolent dictators must be benevolent to not lose support from Us the People.