Tier Nolan [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: š Original date posted:2016-01-11 š Original message:On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at ...
š
Original date posted:2016-01-11
š Original message:On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Luke Dashjr <luke at dashjr.org> wrote:
> - BIP 46 is missing from the repository, but apparently self-soft-assigned
> by
> Tier Nolan in
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2014-April/005545.html
> ; if this was later assigned official, or if he is still
> interested in pursuing this, it seems logical to just keep it at BIP 46.
>
I was never officially assigned any number for this.
Subsequent P2SH changes give the required functionality in an alternative
way. This renders the BIP obsolete.
I suggest marking the number as nonassignable, in order to prevent
confusion with archive searches. I assume that new BIP numbers will be
greater than 100 anyway.
As was pointed out at the time, I shouldn't have used a number in the
original git branch before being assigned it officially.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160112/4632ff10/attachment.html>
š Original message:On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Luke Dashjr <luke at dashjr.org> wrote:
> - BIP 46 is missing from the repository, but apparently self-soft-assigned
> by
> Tier Nolan in
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2014-April/005545.html
> ; if this was later assigned official, or if he is still
> interested in pursuing this, it seems logical to just keep it at BIP 46.
>
I was never officially assigned any number for this.
Subsequent P2SH changes give the required functionality in an alternative
way. This renders the BIP obsolete.
I suggest marking the number as nonassignable, in order to prevent
confusion with archive searches. I assume that new BIP numbers will be
greater than 100 anyway.
As was pointed out at the time, I shouldn't have used a number in the
original git branch before being assigned it officially.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160112/4632ff10/attachment.html>