Event JSON
{
"id": "14ebfa758e4a6c101dac090378d26f8474fbe7f3a9175014a1fa618301988f3d",
"pubkey": "4f3fba82545ff5f921e8df74214ef18bdf4b160cfd99f9438d89648763bfbe43",
"created_at": 1706035076,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"c43bbb58e2e6bc2f9455758257f6ba5329107bd4e8274068c2936c69d9980b7d",
"",
"mention"
],
[
"t",
"AI"
],
[
"t",
"ai"
],
[
"t",
"art"
],
[
"t",
"art"
],
[
"t",
"Aert"
],
[
"t",
"aert"
],
[
"t",
"DallE"
],
[
"t",
"dalle"
],
[
"t",
"Midjourney"
],
[
"t",
"midjourney"
],
[
"t",
"Aesthetics"
],
[
"t",
"aesthetics"
],
[
"t",
"Philosophy"
],
[
"t",
"philosophy"
],
[
"t",
"asknostr"
],
[
"t",
"asknostr"
],
[
"r",
"https://image.nostr.build/070a114e3479825eb7f9a143742abdbf2d27cdaab40dae3354b223e6218ce1a2.jpg#m=image%2Fjpeg\u0026dim=1280x803\u0026blurhash=rAP%3F%3Ah0000M%7BIUxuxuayof_3xut7ofofM%7BM%7BoffQ%7Eq%3Fb%25MRjRjIUIUofay%3Fb-%3B-%3Bxuxu%25M%25MM%7BWB%25Mt7Rjt7xuofofj%5Bj%5BD%25IUD%25Rjj%5Bj%5Bt7xut7\u0026x=b3b4d96460e772dee271589226e5e5e10cf11ea6696b04dd6df9d5903d238016"
]
],
"content": "https://image.nostr.build/070a114e3479825eb7f9a143742abdbf2d27cdaab40dae3354b223e6218ce1a2.jpg#m=image%2Fjpeg\u0026dim=1280x803\u0026blurhash=rAP%3F%3Ah0000M%7BIUxuxuayof_3xut7ofofM%7BM%7BoffQ%7Eq%3Fb%25MRjRjIUIUofay%3Fb-%3B-%3Bxuxu%25M%25MM%7BWB%25Mt7Rjt7xuofofj%5Bj%5BD%25IUD%25Rjj%5Bj%5Bt7xut7\u0026x=b3b4d96460e772dee271589226e5e5e10cf11ea6696b04dd6df9d5903d238016\n\n\nI was thinking on nostr:npub1csamkk8zu67zl9z4wkp90a462v53q775aqn5q6xzjdkxnkvcpd7srtz4x9's post shitting on #AI generated #art the other day.\n\nI think I understand the point that art has a component of expression, of the artist reflecting their whatever on their piece. \n\nHowever, doesn't art also have an element on the receiving side? On whatever the person seeing/listening/reading the piece is moved to feel by the piece? If this is accepted, and if it is accepted that AI art can produce these sensations, AI art should be accepted as a valid way of making art.\n\nThe only way out of this denying the 'arthood' of AI art would be arguing that art is only art if A) the artist reflects something on it or B) AI art is unable to move anyone.\n\nI think B is self-evidently false, and I don't think A is true either as not all art has a creator - nature can be considered artistic by itself, for example, and outside of religious/spiritual interpretations, it does not have a creator.\n\nThis, of course, setting aside the fact that AI is just a tool and can be used to reflect one's own emotions, experiences, or whatever as well.\n\nThoughts?\n\n#AI #Aert #DallE #Midjourney #Aesthetics #Philosophy #asknostr",
"sig": "52350b9542bea2d2215176c9f659cb87f34a029951efb05bd1676f5bc582d9aec8004702320b81381f32efa78bd55f16cd197d48fa1daa73466c57694e898f80"
}
