MAHDOOD on Nostr: When I first started to understand bitcoin, it really put me at peace. I felt so ...
When I first started to understand bitcoin, it really put me at peace. I felt so happy and optimistic about the future. It was euphoric. Michael Saylor was like a prophet. But as I became exposed to some of the other concerns, like privacy, I began to worry about governments trying to attack us. Like what happened with Roman Sterlingov. Chainalysis is a real problem. The samourai team is still not free. And Saylor looks like a real spook to me. I began to notice my euphoria and optimism for the future becoming dark. Then I read mandibles and felt humbled. I am trying to balance the optimism and pessimism but it’s hard. I naturally lean toward pessimism and I kind of understand why some Bitcoiners ignore the problems. This SBR is a problem because of the civil asset forfeiture side. I’ve already been depressed about the future of humanity for so long that I feel so exhausted going down more rabbit holes. So I can’t really blame a bitcoiner who is in his 50s that finally found some hope and wants to ignore the negative stuff. But I can’t do that. Ultimately, advocacy isn’t going to save anyone from government attacks. It’s going to be their own actions: learning about the dangers of KYC and other things like that. Creating a plan to manage those risks and being prepared for the worst is our best bet right now. As Bitcoin becomes more mainstream, it will inevitably bring in more retarded people. We can’t save everyone. The ones that will be saved are the ones that seek out the answers on their own.
Published at
2025-03-08 17:36:26Event JSON
{
"id": "16fa9fb7925ec93d383797ddc38815116b9dc1047843ba30198842c8a02371ad",
"pubkey": "45f195cffcb8c9724efc248f0507a2fb65b579dfabe7cd35398598163cab7627",
"created_at": 1741455386,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"4437ada40865aeba60fa5a20cba77e2fe68cb33c582baad0f3d9bad4983c861e",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"0fd55102f995ca7d17b564e516be18efa977e8b4ad5525c9ab1a13cd10235add",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"e2ccf7cf20403f3f2a4a55b328f0de3be38558a7d5f33632fdaaefc726c1c8eb"
],
[
"p",
"8d78f3903a1b708c77696e07d2f49065e792b830825679af650313c2d3233370"
],
[
"p",
"8aedc87160819e490cb0162acbd8c9a26d79e63db74f5b1b65939012924a7f05"
],
[
"p",
"f985d309197c805e1719c73185b574fc3ee407d7c1b6157dee99c6ace2599bbb"
]
],
"content": "When I first started to understand bitcoin, it really put me at peace. I felt so happy and optimistic about the future. It was euphoric. Michael Saylor was like a prophet. But as I became exposed to some of the other concerns, like privacy, I began to worry about governments trying to attack us. Like what happened with Roman Sterlingov. Chainalysis is a real problem. The samourai team is still not free. And Saylor looks like a real spook to me. I began to notice my euphoria and optimism for the future becoming dark. Then I read mandibles and felt humbled. I am trying to balance the optimism and pessimism but it’s hard. I naturally lean toward pessimism and I kind of understand why some Bitcoiners ignore the problems. This SBR is a problem because of the civil asset forfeiture side. I’ve already been depressed about the future of humanity for so long that I feel so exhausted going down more rabbit holes. So I can’t really blame a bitcoiner who is in his 50s that finally found some hope and wants to ignore the negative stuff. But I can’t do that. Ultimately, advocacy isn’t going to save anyone from government attacks. It’s going to be their own actions: learning about the dangers of KYC and other things like that. Creating a plan to manage those risks and being prepared for the worst is our best bet right now. As Bitcoin becomes more mainstream, it will inevitably bring in more retarded people. We can’t save everyone. The ones that will be saved are the ones that seek out the answers on their own.",
"sig": "4b56d9a60973beb60159a5cb6c8c2f54d6df0eba0c50db7c152a8ae6d6ebc0f1ee9a4f6e73e106d0e886512707879cb9e3a2c8da7b66cf20f616a753f6db3bf2"
}
