Thomas Voegtlin [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2014-03-16 📝 Original message:Thanks again for having a ...
📅 Original date posted:2014-03-16
📝 Original message:Thanks again for having a look.
Given these problems, I have decided to remove
the encryption methods from the current release.
I retagged 1.9.8 and updated the packages.
Thomas
Le 16/03/2014 15:39, Gregory Maxwell a écrit :
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 7:31 AM, Thomas Voegtlin <thomasv1 at gmx.de> wrote:
>> thanks for your feedback!
>>
>> I was not aware that that implementation was flawed.
>> I will see how I can fix that code and get back to you.
> It also leaks on the order of 7 bits of data about the message per
> message chunk. I'm also think it's likely that there are some
> messages which are just incorrectly decrypted. ... it's really
> screwy and suspect.
📝 Original message:Thanks again for having a look.
Given these problems, I have decided to remove
the encryption methods from the current release.
I retagged 1.9.8 and updated the packages.
Thomas
Le 16/03/2014 15:39, Gregory Maxwell a écrit :
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 7:31 AM, Thomas Voegtlin <thomasv1 at gmx.de> wrote:
>> thanks for your feedback!
>>
>> I was not aware that that implementation was flawed.
>> I will see how I can fix that code and get back to you.
> It also leaks on the order of 7 bits of data about the message per
> message chunk. I'm also think it's likely that there are some
> messages which are just incorrectly decrypted. ... it's really
> screwy and suspect.