📅 Original date posted:2021-12-06 📝 Original message: Hi, I'm not a bitcoin ...

Karl [ARCHIVE] /

npub10hv…xjf9

2023-06-09 13:04:33

in reply to nevent1q…uut0

📅 Original date posted:2021-12-06
📝 Original message:
Hi,

I'm not a bitcoin developer.

On Mon, Dec 6, 2021, 5:05 AM Héctor José Cárdenas Pacheco via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> I’ve been thinking about how OP_RETURN is being used to create and trade
> NFTs on Bitcoin (think RarePepes, SoG and other new ones) and was wondering
> if it’s possible to
>

Do you have a link to any of these protocols?

make transactions with this opcode via Lightning.
>
> More specific questions could be:
>
> 1. Can opcodes like OP_RETURN be inside a channel’s opening or closing
> transaction?
> 2. If so, could that OP_RETURN change hands within that channel or
> network of channels?
>
> OP_RETURNs do not have ownership according to the bitcoin network. It is
not hard to define a protocol that associates an OP_RETURN with ownership,
and ownership could then be transferred via lightning by sending associated
currency via lightning. Robustness improvements seem possible.

> 1. If possible, could the OP_RETURN be divisible? Could one person
> send a piece of a OP_RETURN just like one can do right now on the primary
> ledger or would it need to maintain the OP_RETURN code intact?
>
> OP_RETURNs themselves do not have ownership, but you can define a protocol
that gives them divisible ownership, including via lightning.

I’m assuming that, if possible, this would need a protocol layer parallel
> to Bitcoin/Lightning that stores and reads all Bitcoin transactions and the
> ones which involve the node's channels as well as the ones with the
> OP_RETURN, just like CounterParty does right now with the primary ledger.
>
> Thank in advance.
> ——
>
> *Héctor Cárdenas*@hcarpach
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20211206/f3253ec4/attachment.html>;

Author Public Key

npub10hvdghlzknsxl8n9fhevm3hc6ppgkmnhjl0x7999hylnmcm3jursv9xjf9

Seen on

wss://relay.nostr.band

Show more details

Published at

2023-06-09 13:04:33

Kind type

1 Short Text Note

Event JSON

{ "id": "12b87c78b18aa5b62cb1ce0225da623eea40a3504e8ae726a202160a0a62b79c", "pubkey": "7dd8d45fe2b4e06f9e654df2cdc6f8d0428b6e7797de6f14a5b93f3de3719707", "created_at": 1686315873, "kind": 1, "tags": [ [ "e", "b46f2057db0272a7ba31a2acb3724df48f19ce432b6c7cfa249ce761de951d4f", "", "reply" ], [ "p", "9456f7acb763eaab2e02bd8e60cf17df74f352c2ae579dce1f1dd25c95dd611c" ] ], "content": "📅 Original date posted:2021-12-06\n📝 Original message:\nHi,\n\nI'm not a bitcoin developer.\n\nOn Mon, Dec 6, 2021, 5:05 AM Héctor José Cárdenas Pacheco via bitcoin-dev \u003c\nbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e Hello all,\n\u003e\n\u003e I’ve been thinking about how OP_RETURN is being used to create and trade\n\u003e NFTs on Bitcoin (think RarePepes, SoG and other new ones) and was wondering\n\u003e if it’s possible to\n\u003e\n\nDo you have a link to any of these protocols?\n\nmake transactions with this opcode via Lightning.\n\u003e\n\u003e More specific questions could be:\n\u003e\n\u003e 1. Can opcodes like OP_RETURN be inside a channel’s opening or closing\n\u003e transaction?\n\u003e 2. If so, could that OP_RETURN change hands within that channel or\n\u003e network of channels?\n\u003e\n\u003e OP_RETURNs do not have ownership according to the bitcoin network. It is\nnot hard to define a protocol that associates an OP_RETURN with ownership,\nand ownership could then be transferred via lightning by sending associated\ncurrency via lightning. Robustness improvements seem possible.\n\n\n\u003e 1. If possible, could the OP_RETURN be divisible? Could one person\n\u003e send a piece of a OP_RETURN just like one can do right now on the primary\n\u003e ledger or would it need to maintain the OP_RETURN code intact?\n\u003e\n\u003e OP_RETURNs themselves do not have ownership, but you can define a protocol\nthat gives them divisible ownership, including via lightning.\n\nI’m assuming that, if possible, this would need a protocol layer parallel\n\u003e to Bitcoin/Lightning that stores and reads all Bitcoin transactions and the\n\u003e ones which involve the node's channels as well as the ones with the\n\u003e OP_RETURN, just like CounterParty does right now with the primary ledger.\n\u003e\n\u003e Thank in advance.\n\u003e ——\n\u003e\n\u003e *Héctor Cárdenas*@hcarpach\n\u003e\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20211206/f3253ec4/attachment.html\u003e", "sig": "6e2b4091a8b2c18f5981b7b6e872042b4afef9151d3f80f9f93bd0268335bc65e1f850f945ec4d3c82c001983bff69daf159dac5c33546fb29a74f5f96d6532d" }