freemymind on Nostr: I would appriciate if there were more bitcoiners that actually argue based on facts ...
I would appriciate if there were more bitcoiners that actually argue based on facts instead based only on feelings.
Since I would state that any discussion that tries to use objective measures to argue on why a hypothesis is true can help advancing society, where exchanging loose feelings does not lead to constant improvement.
For example: "It is problematic Pavel Durov gets arrested and therefore France is autocratic."
Is a quiet meaningless statement which does not educate.
Where "If Pavel Durov is arrested for encrypting messages and not serve them to authorities would show a tendency to authoritarian governance in France." is a much more powerful statement, since it is agil to disqualify France based on a measurable truth, what the court will base its case on.
Since I would state that any discussion that tries to use objective measures to argue on why a hypothesis is true can help advancing society, where exchanging loose feelings does not lead to constant improvement.
For example: "It is problematic Pavel Durov gets arrested and therefore France is autocratic."
Is a quiet meaningless statement which does not educate.
Where "If Pavel Durov is arrested for encrypting messages and not serve them to authorities would show a tendency to authoritarian governance in France." is a much more powerful statement, since it is agil to disqualify France based on a measurable truth, what the court will base its case on.