clacke: seeking πΈπͺππ°ππ on Nostr: Apart from the control circuitry and maybe the datastream looking different, what ...
Apart from the control circuitry and maybe the datastream looking different, what would be the reason for someone picking one of NAND and NOR over the other for their persistent storage?
I was expecting them to be functionally equivalent and thought the industry had arbitrarily picked NAND over NOR decades ago, but apparently Apple Sllicon uses NOR for their recovery firmware?
Published at
2023-11-02 04:12:25Event JSON
{
"id": "1f02c652c82b380baf0c2c274d99f1d2bac779bcf816faf5475654e3435ae249",
"pubkey": "9c8434d084225d99ae8feedfec7dfd983801af18c94106019efe3d667391bfbc",
"created_at": 1698898345,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"89d48172eef32d20af9e11580d667d4f5ec195107a408bf9abbe0213d0b8aa1e",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://libranet.de/objects/0b6b25a8-4465-4321-a9aa-fe4341456035",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "Apart from the control circuitry and maybe the datastream looking different, what would be the reason for someone picking one of NAND and NOR over the other for their persistent storage?\n\nI was expecting them to be functionally equivalent and thought the industry had arbitrarily picked NAND over NOR decades ago, but apparently Apple Sllicon uses NOR for their recovery firmware?",
"sig": "4daa7f37b761d052cf8bff8e431802458625dcd3e8f5dd1485636bee720f99adbf34cc7ac66bd50c0bde95181a44ecff2b06fcc2ab3653edd598859daea2f2be"
}