@krisnelson@legal.social on Nostr: npub1hpcdf…ghjn3 Ah, that makes sense, even if the terms are less common here in ...
npub1hpcdfjpxrawnmu6ryh36ce7xu4qd54pu6xca394yhvmyzlery0tqvghjn3 (npub1hpc…hjn3) Ah, that makes sense, even if the terms are less common here in the US—a really useful distinction!
So, not dissimilar here in the US, with the "social democratic" unions only having lots of power in the 60s-70s—but by the 80s all unions were losing their power here (in contrast to Europe, I think?).
There is a new boom in unionizing in the US that seems, I'd say, more mixed between what you term syndicalist and social democratic. It also seems much more open to imm., etc.
So, not dissimilar here in the US, with the "social democratic" unions only having lots of power in the 60s-70s—but by the 80s all unions were losing their power here (in contrast to Europe, I think?).
There is a new boom in unionizing in the US that seems, I'd say, more mixed between what you term syndicalist and social democratic. It also seems much more open to imm., etc.