wibble on Nostr: npub1vtyn4…cu3uz npub1ju65t…ahtxx Well, yes. Which is why I think it's best left ...
npub1vtyn4vulw2k03hxv8tnyz0vfws8y8azt5qwdgg5esean2dg4yr2sdcu3uz (npub1vty…u3uz) npub1ju65tzara79pwcaj487uwm00qtyq66hwkvp5alqgwz3r3rcp8m8sdahtxx (npub1ju6…htxx) Well, yes. Which is why I think it's best left as it is.
The uncomfortable feeling about this, which I share, is probably because YT's excuse seemed a lame one, but as they're desperate not to be a publisher, they've got to make it look like a moderation decision. But it's really a bit of reputation-management, a PR game being played by both sides, just like the Coutts thing, in which there's no danger of any moral principles being on the pitch, let alone harmed.
The uncomfortable feeling about this, which I share, is probably because YT's excuse seemed a lame one, but as they're desperate not to be a publisher, they've got to make it look like a moderation decision. But it's really a bit of reputation-management, a PR game being played by both sides, just like the Coutts thing, in which there's no danger of any moral principles being on the pitch, let alone harmed.