I am still :ablobcatsweatsip: ing on Nostr: [migrated to blacksky.co.uk] npub1nkz2v…xexns Continuing from Pawlicker 🔧 post, ...
[migrated to blacksky.co.uk] (npub1srh…8g90) npub1nkz2vjgqjn9y6kmsphg3eaq9up3cncg68schf8da6d6e55ze9f9s0xexns (npub1nkz…exns) Continuing from Pawlicker 🔧 (npub1j4p…z0qp) post, I firmly believe that all top 40 music is just paid for through business contracts and the public is effectively instructed to like it by being forced to hear it over and over. If you did the same thing with AI music, maybe a version from next year, I think you'd get a similar result.
As for making actually good innovative music... hard to say. It may be a matter of pumping out 4,000 songs and having one guy listen to them for a good beat.
As for making actually good innovative music... hard to say. It may be a matter of pumping out 4,000 songs and having one guy listen to them for a good beat.