Gregory Maxwell [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2014-07-27 📝 Original message:On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at ...
📅 Original date posted:2014-07-27
📝 Original message:On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 7:40 PM, Peter Todd <pete at petertodd.org> wrote:
> Anyway, just goes to show that we need to implement better incoming
> connection limiting. gmaxwell has a good scheme with interactive
> proof-of-memory - where's your latest writeup?
Or its a complete snipe hunt, I'm unable to find any nodes with it
connected to them. Does anyone here have any?
Last discussion on the measures for anti-global-resource-consumption
was at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=310323.0 but it hasn't
seemed to be a huge issue such that adding more protocol surface area
was justified.
📝 Original message:On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 7:40 PM, Peter Todd <pete at petertodd.org> wrote:
> Anyway, just goes to show that we need to implement better incoming
> connection limiting. gmaxwell has a good scheme with interactive
> proof-of-memory - where's your latest writeup?
Or its a complete snipe hunt, I'm unable to find any nodes with it
connected to them. Does anyone here have any?
Last discussion on the measures for anti-global-resource-consumption
was at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=310323.0 but it hasn't
seemed to be a huge issue such that adding more protocol surface area
was justified.