leadbyexample on Nostr: I did not participate in this because I hoped to convert you in any way, nor I enjoy ...
I did not participate in this because I hoped to convert you in any way, nor I enjoy poking strangers on thee internet.
I did this hoping that those who happen on this thread and read my replies, will be inspired by the clear divide between my philosophy, and your religion.
So, let's try to put your worldview into as few words as possible:
"a state needs to exist, because missing that, there would be groups of criminals scourging the earth and stealing killing and raping innocent people"
Fine.
I am intentionally diregarding over the irony of the previous statement, as, except raping (maybe?), the rest is already egregiously done by the state.
Where do you even live?
Are there any "rich civilized countries" where groups of criminals are _not_ being actively welcomed in, fed and given shelter, paid for by the taxpayers money?
Are there any "rich civilized countries" where, when attacked by one of the above illegal immigrant criminals, if you shoot him in self defense you will _not_ be fined, incarcerated, expropriated?
Are there any "rich civilized countries" where, if you are being robbed or threatened by whomever, you will receive instant, efficient, painless help by the taxpayer-paid enforcers?
While advocating the existence of the states, you also advocate violent expropriation of wealth in order to pay for the sustenance of criminal migrants, and the service of state-sponsored enforcers, who will not efficiently protect you from the former, but will rather punish you for having attempted to defend yourself.
Is the above accurate?
If not, rectify.
Please reply with arguments, as telling me that I am retarded has only showed your incapability to debate until now.
I did this hoping that those who happen on this thread and read my replies, will be inspired by the clear divide between my philosophy, and your religion.
So, let's try to put your worldview into as few words as possible:
"a state needs to exist, because missing that, there would be groups of criminals scourging the earth and stealing killing and raping innocent people"
Fine.
I am intentionally diregarding over the irony of the previous statement, as, except raping (maybe?), the rest is already egregiously done by the state.
Where do you even live?
Are there any "rich civilized countries" where groups of criminals are _not_ being actively welcomed in, fed and given shelter, paid for by the taxpayers money?
Are there any "rich civilized countries" where, when attacked by one of the above illegal immigrant criminals, if you shoot him in self defense you will _not_ be fined, incarcerated, expropriated?
Are there any "rich civilized countries" where, if you are being robbed or threatened by whomever, you will receive instant, efficient, painless help by the taxpayer-paid enforcers?
While advocating the existence of the states, you also advocate violent expropriation of wealth in order to pay for the sustenance of criminal migrants, and the service of state-sponsored enforcers, who will not efficiently protect you from the former, but will rather punish you for having attempted to defend yourself.
Is the above accurate?
If not, rectify.
Please reply with arguments, as telling me that I am retarded has only showed your incapability to debate until now.