npub1kg…qz7m6 on Nostr: Musk vs Australia’s ‘you can’t say that’ surveillance state ...
Musk vs Australia’s ‘you can’t say that’ surveillance state
https://www.spectator.com.au/2024/04/musk-vs-australias-you-cant-say-that-surveillance-state/
> As I argued in July last year, if an E-Safety department has to exist, it should only be concerned with:
> 1. Protecting children online from sex predators.
> 2. Stopping online scams.
> 3. Restraining provable foreign enemy psyops and disinformation.
> 4. Protecting free and fair elections, as well as freedom of speech.
> 5. Keeping Governments accountable.
https://www.spectator.com.au/2024/04/musk-vs-australias-you-cant-say-that-surveillance-state/
> As I argued in July last year, if an E-Safety department has to exist, it should only be concerned with:
> 1. Protecting children online from sex predators.
> 2. Stopping online scams.
> 3. Restraining provable foreign enemy psyops and disinformation.
> 4. Protecting free and fair elections, as well as freedom of speech.
> 5. Keeping Governments accountable.