rockinhawke on Nostr: no one that I've seen is questioning her rights in criticizing the ideas of fiatjaf ...
no one that I've seen is questioning her rights in criticizing the ideas of fiatjaf (loosely attributed IMO).
That's not what she did though. The point of the article was first and foremost to dox him and the secondary piece was to use the information she found to discredit nostr/nostr community. The icing was using jack's name to drive the views.
freedom of speech isn't potentially putting someone in harm's way.
Published at
2024-06-09 00:14:55Event JSON
{
"id": "15724603b12abd4c1dad5385b7eccccf5689e831fc44d320cdacb73d81b076eb",
"pubkey": "ff6c2abc19e9d694182c19366cddd942779f7b567076ad2ad011fa5839c0761a",
"created_at": 1717892095,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"7a17b552262f21627de1bb5de20b085bd4ed14f300206cbbf138814bd65ea452",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"bb054e835f66549ea735a9c6fd3f8e31b0a9de9d5c35310a41c02e4f555f52bd",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"cf2a80233e4dcfa7d71ee3ad593fdf3b2f71406148e1610a47f868fae6e0eaa8"
],
[
"p",
"3f770d65d3a764a9c5cb503ae123e62ec7598ad035d836e2a810f3877a745b24"
],
[
"p",
"ddf03aca85ade039e6742d5bef3df352df199d0d31e22b9858e7eda85cb3bbbe"
]
],
"content": "no one that I've seen is questioning her rights in criticizing the ideas of fiatjaf (loosely attributed IMO). \n\nThat's not what she did though. The point of the article was first and foremost to dox him and the secondary piece was to use the information she found to discredit nostr/nostr community. The icing was using jack's name to drive the views. \n\nfreedom of speech isn't potentially putting someone in harm's way.",
"sig": "55312471861de4246d5aa92490b69f28d8446de85a565c5dbb90351159c95e0b4f0a8f7aaf7ed3733124896ab2b0149372170ac79099eab9af7be3af5c08f3a6"
}
