Tier Nolan [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-09-16 📝 Original message:On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-09-16
📝 Original message:On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 9:27 PM, Jorge Timón <jtimon at jtimon.cc> wrote:
> For enforcing new restrictions on your own blocks (thus at the policy
> level, not consensus) you don't need to wait for 75%. You can do it from
> the start (this way all miners setting the bit will enforce the new
> restrictions.
>
At 75%, you have a pretty solid super-majority.
You can safely reject blocks that have the bit set but are invalid
according to the new rule (as long as everyone who sets the bit does it
too).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150916/d701990e/attachment-0001.html>;
📝 Original message:On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 9:27 PM, Jorge Timón <jtimon at jtimon.cc> wrote:
> For enforcing new restrictions on your own blocks (thus at the policy
> level, not consensus) you don't need to wait for 75%. You can do it from
> the start (this way all miners setting the bit will enforce the new
> restrictions.
>
At 75%, you have a pretty solid super-majority.
You can safely reject blocks that have the bit set but are invalid
according to the new rule (as long as everyone who sets the bit does it
too).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150916/d701990e/attachment-0001.html>;