Russell O'Connor [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2017-04-02 📝 Original message:On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at ...
📅 Original date posted:2017-04-02
📝 Original message:On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Johnson Lau via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> • the witness of the first input of the coinbase transaction MUST
> have exactly one stack item (the "extended header"), with the following
> data:
> • bytes 0 to 3: nHeight MUST be equal to the height of
> this block (signed little endian)
>
Someone told me a while back that it would be more natural if we move the
nHeight from the coinbase script to the coinbase locktime. Have you
considered doing this?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170402/98da6ac9/attachment.html>;
📝 Original message:On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Johnson Lau via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> • the witness of the first input of the coinbase transaction MUST
> have exactly one stack item (the "extended header"), with the following
> data:
> • bytes 0 to 3: nHeight MUST be equal to the height of
> this block (signed little endian)
>
Someone told me a while back that it would be more natural if we move the
nHeight from the coinbase script to the coinbase locktime. Have you
considered doing this?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170402/98da6ac9/attachment.html>;