esmevane, sorry on Nostr: npub1pfe56…9e2dm I have a tinfoil hat theory about this. I think other (corporate) ...
npub1pfe56vzppw077dd04ycr8mx72dqdk0m95ccdfu2j9ak3n7m89nrsf9e2dm (npub1pfe…e2dm) I have a tinfoil hat theory about this.
I think other (corporate) networks want as many famous users as they can get. So when a famous person gets on, and doesn't have fun, the network loses a user they want more than other users.
Ok, here's the theory: I think networks algorithmically pamper famous people, and they're not getting that here. Sort of the inverse of shadow-banning someone. Basically, I think in other spots they get rando shields and they're blissfully unaware.
I think other (corporate) networks want as many famous users as they can get. So when a famous person gets on, and doesn't have fun, the network loses a user they want more than other users.
Ok, here's the theory: I think networks algorithmically pamper famous people, and they're not getting that here. Sort of the inverse of shadow-banning someone. Basically, I think in other spots they get rando shields and they're blissfully unaware.