Jürgen Hubert on Nostr: One neat feature Google+ had back in the day were user-defined "Circles" - basically ...
One neat feature Google+ had back in the day were user-defined "Circles" - basically lists of people you followed _and could share with others_. So basically people could define lists with "These people talk a lot about science", "these people share amazing photography" and so forth.
And then they could post these Circles to their timeline, and others could follow all these users with a single click.
Is there a downside for implementing this feature for the #Fediverse ?
Published at
2024-11-13 14:33:23Event JSON
{
"id": "8172d4e7e0317cdf1ea8698c740d26bd284113554dd6a179bbfceccb2f1dd22e",
"pubkey": "1da09686ed9dae8d6794d26149ad0ad75441e0e3ec51d47ff0bddc33796afbe1",
"created_at": 1731508403,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"t",
"fediverse"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://thefolklore.cafe/users/juergen_hubert/statuses/113476134757804558",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "One neat feature Google+ had back in the day were user-defined \"Circles\" - basically lists of people you followed _and could share with others_. So basically people could define lists with \"These people talk a lot about science\", \"these people share amazing photography\" and so forth.\n\nAnd then they could post these Circles to their timeline, and others could follow all these users with a single click.\n\nIs there a downside for implementing this feature for the #Fediverse ?",
"sig": "4acd75de73e28fe5f20036559f7092ecce50619b951ad9a5defab9e040bde3c759fb6c52fb651bc5cab34326ee0cb3684a841071380de5a208252f99c5039bea"
}
