Antoine Riard [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2022-11-14 📝 Original message:Reminder: this is ...
📅 Original date posted:2022-11-14
📝 Original message:Reminder: this is happening this _upcoming_ Tuesday.
Looking forward to the first session, listening to everyone's thoughts
about what could be the scope discussed by this new community process:
anyprevout, recursive covenants, introspection, new malleability flags, ZK
rollups, new contracting protocols and many more ideas!
Best,
Antoine
Le lun. 31 oct. 2022 à 20:47, Antoine Riard <antoine.riard at gmail.com> a
écrit :
> Hi list,
>
> After I have been asked offline the exact date when those meetings were
> actually starting, I'm proposing Tuesday 15th November at 18:00 UTC, i.e 2
> weeks from now. Thinking about a monthly frequency for now (from my
> experience attending dlcspecs/lighnting specs meetings/core dev meetings in
> the past, weekly sounds too much, biweekly/monthly sounds better though
> dunno yet good frequency).
>
> If there is an incompatibility with another public engineering meeting in
> the Bitcoin space, let it know. We can talk about a better schedule during
> the 1st session [0].
>
> Communication venue is #bitcoin-contracting-primitives-wg on Libera Chat
> [1]. Feel free to lurk already and ask questions.
>
> No consistent agenda beyond listening to every attendee their
> expectations, ideas, subjects of interests they would like to see happening
> with this new covenants/contracting primitives R&D process.
>
> If you have been working on a contracting
> protocols/side-chains/rollups/other use-cases that could benefit from
> extended Bitcoin contracting primitives, feel free to open an issue there:
> https://github.com/ariard/bitcoin-contracting-primitives-wg/issues
>
> Let it know if you have more questions or feedback.
>
> Cheers,
> Antoine
>
> [0] It would be great to have a schedule inclusive of most timezones we
> can, 18:00 UTC might be too early for Asian and Oceanic ones. Later, we
> start to be exclusive towards contributors in Eastern Europe.
>
> [1] There have been more voices suggesting jitsi/audio-based meetings
> rather than IRC. It's a cool format too, though coming with trade-offs.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20221113/5b535a7c/attachment.html>;
📝 Original message:Reminder: this is happening this _upcoming_ Tuesday.
Looking forward to the first session, listening to everyone's thoughts
about what could be the scope discussed by this new community process:
anyprevout, recursive covenants, introspection, new malleability flags, ZK
rollups, new contracting protocols and many more ideas!
Best,
Antoine
Le lun. 31 oct. 2022 à 20:47, Antoine Riard <antoine.riard at gmail.com> a
écrit :
> Hi list,
>
> After I have been asked offline the exact date when those meetings were
> actually starting, I'm proposing Tuesday 15th November at 18:00 UTC, i.e 2
> weeks from now. Thinking about a monthly frequency for now (from my
> experience attending dlcspecs/lighnting specs meetings/core dev meetings in
> the past, weekly sounds too much, biweekly/monthly sounds better though
> dunno yet good frequency).
>
> If there is an incompatibility with another public engineering meeting in
> the Bitcoin space, let it know. We can talk about a better schedule during
> the 1st session [0].
>
> Communication venue is #bitcoin-contracting-primitives-wg on Libera Chat
> [1]. Feel free to lurk already and ask questions.
>
> No consistent agenda beyond listening to every attendee their
> expectations, ideas, subjects of interests they would like to see happening
> with this new covenants/contracting primitives R&D process.
>
> If you have been working on a contracting
> protocols/side-chains/rollups/other use-cases that could benefit from
> extended Bitcoin contracting primitives, feel free to open an issue there:
> https://github.com/ariard/bitcoin-contracting-primitives-wg/issues
>
> Let it know if you have more questions or feedback.
>
> Cheers,
> Antoine
>
> [0] It would be great to have a schedule inclusive of most timezones we
> can, 18:00 UTC might be too early for Asian and Oceanic ones. Later, we
> start to be exclusive towards contributors in Eastern Europe.
>
> [1] There have been more voices suggesting jitsi/audio-based meetings
> rather than IRC. It's a cool format too, though coming with trade-offs.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20221113/5b535a7c/attachment.html>;