What is Nostr?
Anthony Towns [ARCHIVE] /
npub17rlโ€ฆ9l2h
2023-06-07 23:07:05

Anthony Towns [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: ๐Ÿ“… Original date posted:2022-04-24 ๐Ÿ“ Original message:On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at ...

๐Ÿ“… Original date posted:2022-04-24
๐Ÿ“ Original message:On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 12:13:08PM +0100, Jorge Timรณn wrote:
> You're not even considering user resistance in your cases.

Of course I am. Again:

> > My claim is that for *any* bad (evil, flawed, whatever) softfork, then
> > attempting activation via bip8 is *never* superior to speedy trial,
> > and in some cases is worse.
> >
> > If I'm missing something, you only need to work through a single example
> > to demonstrate I'm wrong, which seems like it ought to be easy... But
> > just saying "I disagree" and "I don't want to talk about that" isn't
> > going to convince anyone.

The "some cases" where bip8 with lot=true is *worse* than speedy trial
is when miners correctly see that a bad fork is bad.

Under *any* other circumstance, when they're used to activate a bad soft
fork, speedy trial and bip8 are the same. If a resistance method works
against bip8, it works against speedy trial; if it fails against speedy
trial, it fails against bip8.

> Sorry for the aggressive tone, but I when people ignore some of my points
> repeteadly, I start to wonder if they do it on purpose.

Perhaps examine the beam in your own eye.

Cheers,
aj
Author Public Key
npub17rld56k4365lfphyd8u8kwuejey5xcazdxptserx03wc4jc9g24stx9l2h