Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her) on Nostr: 1) Again we see the harm of the term "AI". While there could be some useful ...
1) Again we see the harm of the term "AI". While there could be some useful applications of machine learning to various climate or materials data in the context of the climate crisis, LLMs (ChatGPT et al) have nothing to do with that.
2) "AI" is bad, actually.
Published at
2024-07-15 13:07:20Event JSON
{
"id": "8303e30e39d52968669a6089c49f6bfe88f57f147ebc56dd4b9a34479095cafe",
"pubkey": "13ec9fd5058a18cd097d105fd6ef43759e37d5915b1c01ed36acf0ef5a3e6f2a",
"created_at": 1721048840,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"d966e9d23fc8072ae542b1c8f01cbd86dcaf24268cfb91d26dde763470e9b01a",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://dair-community.social/users/emilymbender/statuses/112790656828999365",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "1) Again we see the harm of the term \"AI\". While there could be some useful applications of machine learning to various climate or materials data in the context of the climate crisis, LLMs (ChatGPT et al) have nothing to do with that.\n\n2) \"AI\" is bad, actually.",
"sig": "796bfc2caaa0d6d2b4daf51108c92749da083ecb217a34822f22d7e9cdb1aa6777f29cccce6fd60fc60a130d45e8ba4ed824c66cb04d5c75454069dbb02e162c"
}
