Event JSON
{
"id": "8742140761dca01cb539f7c5879d706ed84d6122074d0a95483ce4beb3ecf64f",
"pubkey": "9136d632625ea6c3f7bff87ac734778d135d22a9649deaf39471c02b62bfe4cd",
"created_at": 1694039097,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"79ec492e04c66959fc89099b1aa5c07766d9565b576ecaf8273ea3663d76758b",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"9bd23691fdf337f38d47cf037cc394aea3a3c8d9d757bcd6414213973c32c861",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"80b79808fa7d7ed5d7d14e9142a6aad69ccc85ea8642151a063151d41438ce0f",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://social.cologne/users/bee8bit/statuses/111020546302276911",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub108kyjtsyce54nlyfpxd34fwqwandj4jm2ahv47p8863kv0tkwk9s5yxqaw So, in simpler terms: Does that mean that scientists who try to estimate the age of something by C-14, they might be wrong by ~1200 years if they measure the C-14 in some plankton, because those species already have a lower (or is it higher?) percentage of C-14 in them while still alive?",
"sig": "809e1563762085b92bc3d56921cffa2919afca3fa0b562db6b2afbc001ea54327db01566819a367af14d15d8ed0d8df38a3b8cd02d5fdf0d1fe6e4ce1caca05f"
}