Jorge Timón [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2017-04-02 📝 Original message:Just saying that we can ...
📅 Original date posted:2017-04-02
📝 Original message:Just saying that we can talk in terms of weight alone after segwit. 8 mb
weight is much more clear than 2 mb size to me. 2 mb size seems to
obfuscate the actual new limit with the proposed hf, which simply 8 mb
weight.
On 2 Apr 2017 12:03 pm, "Natanael" <natanael.l at gmail.com> wrote:
> My point, if you missed it, is that there's a mathematical equivalence
> between using two limits (and calculating the ratio) vs using one limit and
> a ratio. The output is fully identical. The only difference is the order of
> operations. Saying there's no blocksize limit with this is pretty
> meaningless, because you're just saying you're using an abstraction that
> doesn't make the limit visible.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170402/73a2096f/attachment.html>;
📝 Original message:Just saying that we can talk in terms of weight alone after segwit. 8 mb
weight is much more clear than 2 mb size to me. 2 mb size seems to
obfuscate the actual new limit with the proposed hf, which simply 8 mb
weight.
On 2 Apr 2017 12:03 pm, "Natanael" <natanael.l at gmail.com> wrote:
> My point, if you missed it, is that there's a mathematical equivalence
> between using two limits (and calculating the ratio) vs using one limit and
> a ratio. The output is fully identical. The only difference is the order of
> operations. Saying there's no blocksize limit with this is pretty
> meaningless, because you're just saying you're using an abstraction that
> doesn't make the limit visible.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170402/73a2096f/attachment.html>;