Stu on Nostr: But why? It’s just compromising the adoption for a currency use case to accommodate ...
But why?
It’s just compromising the adoption for a currency use case to accommodate a second use case.
Sometimes it’s better to just do one thing well. Especially when market penetration for the primary use case is still less than 1%.
Now we will have miners collecting fees for storage, and advocating design decisions for Bitcoin around that commercial reality.
I’m not trying to win an argument on this, just thinking out loud. Happy to be corrected or educated on this.
It’s just compromising the adoption for a currency use case to accommodate a second use case.
Sometimes it’s better to just do one thing well. Especially when market penetration for the primary use case is still less than 1%.
Now we will have miners collecting fees for storage, and advocating design decisions for Bitcoin around that commercial reality.
I’m not trying to win an argument on this, just thinking out loud. Happy to be corrected or educated on this.