Kalle Rosenbaum [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-06-06 📝 Original message:2015-06-06 18:10 GMT+02:00 ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-06-06
📝 Original message:2015-06-06 18:10 GMT+02:00 Tom Harding <tomh at thinlink.com>:
> On Jun 6, 2015 8:05 AM, "Kalle Rosenbaum" <kalle at rosenbaum.se> wrote:
>
>> I'm open to changes here.
>
> I suggest:
>
> - Don't include any real outputs. They are redundant because the txid is
> already referenced.
with the nLocktime solution, the copied outputs are not needed.
>
> - Start the proof script, which should be invalid, with a magic constant and
> include space for future expansion. This makes PoP's easy to identify and
> extend.
I did remore the constant (a "PoP" literal ascii encoded string)
because it didn't add much. The recipient will expect a pop, so it
will simply treat it as one. I did add a 2 byte version field to make
it extendable.
>
> - "Proof of Potential"
Noted :-)
Thank you
/Kalle
📝 Original message:2015-06-06 18:10 GMT+02:00 Tom Harding <tomh at thinlink.com>:
> On Jun 6, 2015 8:05 AM, "Kalle Rosenbaum" <kalle at rosenbaum.se> wrote:
>
>> I'm open to changes here.
>
> I suggest:
>
> - Don't include any real outputs. They are redundant because the txid is
> already referenced.
with the nLocktime solution, the copied outputs are not needed.
>
> - Start the proof script, which should be invalid, with a magic constant and
> include space for future expansion. This makes PoP's easy to identify and
> extend.
I did remore the constant (a "PoP" literal ascii encoded string)
because it didn't add much. The recipient will expect a pop, so it
will simply treat it as one. I did add a 2 byte version field to make
it extendable.
>
> - "Proof of Potential"
Noted :-)
Thank you
/Kalle