Event JSON
{
"id": "80fedd428fe761bbe0e4b3f2f6e00f6f5bea8c78fc6ab04a39fa26fdb9e470fc",
"pubkey": "1a1470a6bd4d594c8c32e9f10097fce983e76d6885c4a636448a2ce4df1f931d",
"created_at": 1692205080,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"cbf60e3bea215edef235d9cc1695bf4d8909814be8bf06f3fbbd4bfed33005dd",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"d7c728ed78d535eb172ac6c10d1a0e675de8ac7ff0bb8ba314a2c155822a2943",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"a2d8371c55af31be840267198b9fe24ce9ac022a144502740ec6e35ec8685e08",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://fediscience.org/users/helenczerski/statuses/110900352139444510",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub1e0mquwl2y90dau34m8xpd9dlfkysnq2tazlsdulmh49la5esqhwselg578 In the case of CDR I think about what scaling up a lot of the proposed schemes would look like, particularly for the ocean. Creating vast seaweed farms in places without seaweed now, artificial upwelling, iron fertilisation etc - none of these are consequence-free when scaled up. But the discussion is framed as though scaling up any of them should just be accepted, without acknowledging the damage that scaling would cause, and talking openly about the trade-off",
"sig": "fd111b8a437ebe2451eb585e18516fc2909f5224c876043f7ea43a6512ed95305e0e421b4b90d0d884d6739cedded70583a8f95bf155b7212ad3347f6a376bd6"
}