Leo Wandersleb on Nostr: But the recipient still is publicly marked as having received BTC, right? It's just ...
But the recipient still is publicly marked as having received BTC, right? It's just not necessary to zap for allowance and many other types of payment.
And a completely private zap would maybe be good as a payment receipt but then it wouldn't be a zap, would it?
Published at
2024-07-01 18:42:50Event JSON
{
"id": "89f0c299537f74f62e2558615829401e9c4ae3f1612d0fbd2b50e90e93087ee5",
"pubkey": "46fcbe3065eaf1ae7811465924e48923363ff3f526bd6f73d7c184b16bd8ce4d",
"created_at": 1719859370,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"65ae73e0b805b3ac0486bbd1b200013449ae2d97f1a5ee3e76e717e6ce555d58",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"2a930ce4f483736fd1ce8720ed8655038742455ede6c894137ac5f7512d4925e",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"32e1827635450ebb3c5a7d12c1f8e7b2b514439ac10a67eef3d9fd9c5c68e245",
"",
"mention"
],
[
"p",
"58c741aa630c2da35a56a77c1d05381908bd10504fdd2d8b43f725efa6d23196",
"",
"mention"
]
],
"content": "But the recipient still is publicly marked as having received BTC, right? It's just not necessary to zap for allowance and many other types of payment.\n\nAnd a completely private zap would maybe be good as a payment receipt but then it wouldn't be a zap, would it?",
"sig": "d4d9840ecde743929755ac34ed325435f6995c20e2edeeb6abe4129a5128ae0f69b2a41be340eca6b761652ba2afd2157441624c0e8c4c4144cac41db1f829ed"
}
