Aaron Pressman on Nostr: SCOTUS case of Brown Shoe Co. v US: “Well defined submarkets may exist which, in ...
SCOTUS case of Brown Shoe Co. v US: “Well defined submarkets may exist which, in themselves, constitute product markets for antitrust purposes...The boundaries of such a submarket may be determined by…the product's peculiar characteristics and uses, unique production facilities, distinct customers, distinct prices, sensitivity to price changes...”
Published at
2024-03-23 14:38:10Event JSON
{
"id": "89c139f6bd7cc88b36fca550f49c2383100c64df1df93fab3304588e9aeccab4",
"pubkey": "37d52881628bb3747b64681cdc6b66013b4f1b1518face630884f4ffec47b778",
"created_at": 1711204690,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"794789ffb8d01c5385b634ac3e9d065d9fa802741e866f59c6326e349a50027f",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://journa.host/users/ampressman/statuses/112145510601414147",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "SCOTUS case of Brown Shoe Co. v US: “Well defined submarkets may exist which, in themselves, constitute product markets for antitrust purposes...The boundaries of such a submarket may be determined by…the product's peculiar characteristics and uses, unique production facilities, distinct customers, distinct prices, sensitivity to price changes...”",
"sig": "fa199ee593b154bc3a312066dd871c4825aa0444ccce653ae1d0ab91128d048c47aca5fddc04a5ab74d2181f42fab140bed37ef2ec02737d104a588afc74cc2e"
}
