Eric Lombrozo [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-05-07 📝 Original message:> On May 7, 2015, at 4:20 ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-05-07
📝 Original message:> On May 7, 2015, at 4:20 AM, Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> For sake of brevity, this ignores the inherent practical and political issues in scheduling a hardfork.
IMHO, these issues are the elephant in the room and the talk of block size increases is just a distraction.
- Eric Lombrozo
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150507/5de81f02/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150507/5de81f02/attachment.sig>
📝 Original message:> On May 7, 2015, at 4:20 AM, Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> For sake of brevity, this ignores the inherent practical and political issues in scheduling a hardfork.
IMHO, these issues are the elephant in the room and the talk of block size increases is just a distraction.
- Eric Lombrozo
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150507/5de81f02/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150507/5de81f02/attachment.sig>