Alex Mizrahi [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-02-12 📝 Original message:> To remain useful as ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-02-12
📝 Original message:> To remain useful as border router, the replace-by-fee patched core should
> only relay double spend if it actually replaces an earlier transaction, as
> otherwise the replace logic that is according to your commit more than just
> fee comparison, would have to be replicated in the proprietary stack and
> mempool might get out of sync with that of the border router.
>
Why don't you use getrawmempool RPC call to synchronize mempool contents?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150212/d898c0e1/attachment.html>;
📝 Original message:> To remain useful as border router, the replace-by-fee patched core should
> only relay double spend if it actually replaces an earlier transaction, as
> otherwise the replace logic that is according to your commit more than just
> fee comparison, would have to be replicated in the proprietary stack and
> mempool might get out of sync with that of the border router.
>
Why don't you use getrawmempool RPC call to synchronize mempool contents?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150212/d898c0e1/attachment.html>;