📅 Original date posted:2017-06-20 📝 Original message:Also Jonas Nick gave a ...

Adam Back [ARCHIVE] /

npub1ac8…swfj

2023-06-07 18:02:14

in reply to nevent1q…whu2

📅 Original date posted:2017-06-20
📝 Original message:Also Jonas Nick gave a fairly comprehensive presentation on privacy
leaks in bitcoin protocol including SPV and bloom query problem
specifics:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HScK4pkDNds

Adam

On 20 June 2017 at 14:08, bfd--- via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On 2017-06-20 12:52, Tom Zander via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>>
>> Second, stating that a bloom filter is a "total loss of privacy" is
>> equally
>> baseless and doesn’t need debunking.
>>
>
> "On the Privacy Provisions of Bloom Filters in Lightweight Bitcoin Clients"
>
>> We show analytically and empirically that the reliance on Bloom filters
>> within existing SPV clients leaks considerable information about the
>> addresses of Bitcoin users. Our results show that an SPV client who uses a
>> modest number of Bitcoin addresses (e.g., < 20) risks revealing almost all
>> of his addresses.
>
>
> https://eprint.iacr.org/2014/763.pdf
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev

Author Public Key

npub1ac86vemj7ce5z8jyxt39rna3tvwql6xd30ha3vxcd6esysp23d9qrlswfj

Seen on

wss://relay.nostr.band

Show more details

Published at

2023-06-07 18:02:14

Kind type

1 Short Text Note

Event JSON

{ "id": "8b4cec184d7dd77f21918ea0c7b2c0f2ebb195c1ccbaa1757bf81cc56442aa9b", "pubkey": "ee0fa66772f633411e4432e251cfb15b1c0fe8cd8befd8b0d86eb302402a8b4a", "created_at": 1686160934, "kind": 1, "tags": [ [ "e", "55a56c7ebba05dd9613a9ae00ae6d5bbfa4f7fd0155fa447a7d09d61ff658a4b", "", "root" ], [ "e", "ce005427e9d992a3af6ec849d935feeb9790d28767f25001e8179c2adb8ff6a5", "", "reply" ], [ "p", "db760dade1185adc64d6fc9226d5fc4fa6c1e29ac791042a019c7e8c4917470c" ] ], "content": "📅 Original date posted:2017-06-20\n📝 Original message:Also Jonas Nick gave a fairly comprehensive presentation on privacy\nleaks in bitcoin protocol including SPV and bloom query problem\nspecifics:\n\nhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HScK4pkDNds\n\nAdam\n\n\nOn 20 June 2017 at 14:08, bfd--- via bitcoin-dev\n\u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e On 2017-06-20 12:52, Tom Zander via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e Second, stating that a bloom filter is a \"total loss of privacy\" is\n\u003e\u003e equally\n\u003e\u003e baseless and doesn’t need debunking.\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e \"On the Privacy Provisions of Bloom Filters in Lightweight Bitcoin Clients\"\n\u003e\n\u003e\u003e We show analytically and empirically that the reliance on Bloom filters\n\u003e\u003e within existing SPV clients leaks considerable information about the\n\u003e\u003e addresses of Bitcoin users. Our results show that an SPV client who uses a\n\u003e\u003e modest number of Bitcoin addresses (e.g., \u003c 20) risks revealing almost all\n\u003e\u003e of his addresses.\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e https://eprint.iacr.org/2014/763.pdf\n\u003e\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev", "sig": "339180f32efc66bc3317aac968282e27c37bbdf3f5413c4a44e0eae4230b371419c4f396fe9cd9c6db1db0820078b31285d01f488af27c0ddf661779059ab542" }