Russell O'Connor [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2018-02-14 📝 Original message:On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at ...
📅 Original date posted:2018-02-14
📝 Original message:On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 6:42 PM, Peter Todd <pete at petertodd.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 06:19:40PM -0500, Russell O'Connor wrote:
> > Surely CPFP is already computing the package-fee rates of mempool
> > transactions. That is the value we need to compute.
>
> True, maybe we can just reuse the CPFP calculation now. That said, AFAIK
> that's
> only done in the miner code, not the mempool, so that may not be trivial to
> actually do.
>
Do you (or anyone else) know if the package fee rate is considered when
ejecting transactions from the bottom of the mempool when the mempool gets
too large?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20180214/18428424/attachment-0001.html>;
📝 Original message:On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 6:42 PM, Peter Todd <pete at petertodd.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 06:19:40PM -0500, Russell O'Connor wrote:
> > Surely CPFP is already computing the package-fee rates of mempool
> > transactions. That is the value we need to compute.
>
> True, maybe we can just reuse the CPFP calculation now. That said, AFAIK
> that's
> only done in the miner code, not the mempool, so that may not be trivial to
> actually do.
>
Do you (or anyone else) know if the package fee rate is considered when
ejecting transactions from the bottom of the mempool when the mempool gets
too large?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20180214/18428424/attachment-0001.html>;